Amnioinfusion for thick meconium stained fluid not effective for preventing meconium aspiration syndrome, perinatal death, or both.

For laboring women with thick meconium staining of amniotic fluid, amnioinfusion did not reduce the risk of perinatal death, moderate or severe meconium aspiration syndrome, or both. The study was adequately powered at the 80% level to detect a decrease in the expected outcome from 5% to 2.5%.

Citation/s:
Fraser, WD, et al. Amnioinfusion for the prevention of the meconium aspiration syndrome. N Engl J Med 2005;353:909-17
Lead author's name and fax:

Three-part Clinical Question: In laboring women with thick meconium staining of the amniotic fluid, does amnioinfusion of saline into the amniotic cavity, compared to no amnioinfusion, result in decreased risk of perinatal death, moderate or severe meconium aspiration syndrome, or both?
Search Terms:

The Study:
Single-blinded randomised controlled trial with intention-to-treat.
The Study Patients: 56 centers in 13 countries; women with thick meconium staining of amniotic fluid, cephalic singleton fetus at 36 weeks or more gestation, cervix dilated 2 to 7 cm and no FHT indications for urgent delivery (late decelerations, etc). Exclusions included fetal anomaly, chorioamnionitis, vaginal bleeding, infection, and others. 1998 women were randomized to amnioinfusion or standard care by central computerized randomization. Stratification by study center, and by the presence of variable decelerations (3 or more) during the 30 minutes prior to randomization.
Control group (N = 1003; 989 analysed): Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suctioning after shoulder delivery and again after infant delivery. Oxytocin augmentation of labor permitted.
Experimental group (N = 995; 986 analysed): Amnioinfusion performed immediately after randomization: 800 cc sterile saline under force of gravity at 20 cc per minute x 40 minutes, followed by 2 cc per minute to max of 1500 cc, with IUPC monitoring. Continuous FHT monitoring. Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suctioning after shoulder delivery, and again after infant delivery. Oxytocin augmentation of labor permitted in both groups. Neonatologists (3) were blinded to study group in determining outcomes.

The Evidence:

Outcome

Time to Outcome

CER

EER

RRR

ARR

NNT

Primary: perinatal death, moderate or severe meconium aspiration syndrome or both.

 

0.035

0.044

-26%

-0.009

-111

95% Confidence Intervals:

-75% to 23%

-0.026 to 0.008

NNT = 124 to INF; NNH = 38 to INF

Secondary: perinatal death, other serious morbidity or both, including kApgar score below 7, umbilical pH below 7.05, trauma or serious maternal morbidity

 

0.099

0.113

-14%

-0.014

-71

95% Confidence Intervals:

-41% to 13%

-0.041 to 0.013

NNT = 77 to INF; NNH = 24 to INF

Perinatal death alone

 

0.005

0.005

0%

0.000

INF

95% Confidence Intervals:

-124% to 100%

-0.006 to 0.006

NNT = 162 to INF; NNH = 162 to INF

Comments:
Prophylactic pharyngeal suctioning and tracheal aspiration have not been shown to reduce the risk of the meconium aspiration syndrome. A previous meta-analysis of small studies (Cochrane, 2002) suggested that amnioinfusion might prevent some cases of meconium aspiration syndrome occurring with thick meconium. This large, carefully done multicenter trial with nearly 2000 patients concludes that this is not the case. Reasons may include that meconium aspiration occurs before the labor process begins, or that other processes involving the lungs (indicative of longstanding fetal stress) may already be present for which intrauterine meconium passage is a marker. Of note, stratified analysis also showed no effect when decelerations in fetal heart rate were present at randomization, although the study authors admit that the study was not powered to detect a difference in this smaller (17% of total) group. Regarding maternal outcomes, there were no differences in the rates of cesarean delivery (approx 30%), peripartum fever (3%0, maternal death or serious morbidity (1.5%), uterine rupture (0.2%), or hemorrhage (1.1%).

Appraised by: CAT author: Linda Olson Douglas, MD JC Leader: Lynne DeSotel, MD ; Tuesday, December 13, 2005
Email:
Kill or Update By: